Mixed mode failure criteria for a glass/epoxy composite and an adhesively bonded composite/composite joint

By F. Ducept, P. Davies, D. Gamby. 2000

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Pure mode II fracture characterization of composite bonded joints (2009, background): “Fracture characterization of bonded joints under pure mode I has been extensively studied by several authors (Andersson and Stigh, 2004; Bader et al., 2000; Ducept et al., 2000; Nairn, 2000).”
A review on failure theories and simulation models for adhesive joints (2021, methodology): “As a further complication, the critical value of the ERR and the Paris-like law for the fatigue crack propagation are strongly dependant on the ratio between the mode I and II components, generally with a higher resistance to crack propagation as a pure mode II condition is approached (see, for inst”
A status report on delamination resistance testing of polymer-matrix composites (2008, unknown): “[68].”
Crack equivalent concept applied to the fracture characterization of bonded joints under pure mode I loading (2008, methodology): “The majority of joints fracture characterization under pure mode I is performed using the DCB specimen [3, 8-10].”