Farm-Level Economic Performance of Genetically Modified Cotton in Maharashtra, India

By R. Bennett, U. Kambhampati, S. Morse, Y. Ismael. 2006

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/17f07bb7585f4252aab2949bab8245fc82479b1d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. Glenn Stone
2. M. Qaim
3. Arjunan Subramanian
4. Kibrom T. Sibhatu
5. M. Maertens
6. Elisabeth Fischer

In Plant Science

1. Glenn Stone
2. M. Qaim
3. Arjunan Subramanian
4. S. Kouser
5. Elaine M. Liu

Citations in the corpus

• The Impact of Bt Cotton on Poor Households in Rural India (2008, background): “The results presented in Table 1 are consistent with other studies in India (for example, Bennett et al., 2006; Gandhi and Namboodiri, 2006; Crost et al., 2007; Dev and Rao, 2007).”
• Field versus Farm in Warangal: Bt Cotton, Higher Yields, and Larger Questions (2011, methodology): “…et al., 2007, Table 4) link Bt cotton to increased pesticide use, the strong pattern in peer-reviewed research is for insecticide use to drop with Bt cotton adoption (Bennett, Ismael, Kambhampati, & Morse, 2004; Bennett, Ismael, & Morse, 2005; Bennett et al., 2006; Qaim, 2003; Qaim et al., 2006).”
• The Economics of Genetically Modified Crops (2009, background): “Bennett et al. (2006) estimated Cobb-Douglas-type production functions for a sample of farmers in India.”