Aesthetic preferences and the attribution of meaning: Environmental categorization processes in the evaluation of urban scenes

By Ma Paz Galindo, M. Carmen Hidalgo. 2005

127 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Effect of predictors of visual preference as characteristics of urban natural landscapes in increasing perceived restorative potential (2014, background): “The authors suggested that restorative places tend to be open and luminous and are places noted for leisure and social interactions (Galindo and Hidalgo, 2005).”
Destination Aesthetics and Aesthetic Distance in Tourism Experience (2015, unknown): “…to influence environmental preference in the urban setting: naturalness, maintenance (Galindo & Rodriguez, 2000), vegetation, visual richness, congruence, luminosity, historicity (Galindo & Hidalgo, 2005), stylistic uniformity, homogeneity of scale, and symmetry (Weber, Schnier, & Jacobsen, 2008).”
The perceived restorativeness of gardens – Assessing the restorativeness of a mixed built and natural scene type (2008, methodology): “Results in previous studies have shown that the restorative capacity of a place seems to be connected to places considered attractive and that favourite places have a high restorativeness (Korpela and Hartig, 1996; Korpela et al., 2001; Galindo and Hidalgo, 2005).”