A new method for determining small misorientations from electron back scatter diffraction patterns

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The effect of crystal orientation on the indentation response of commercially pure titanium: experiments and simulations (2010, background): “Hough-based EBSD analysis is limited to an angular resolution of ±0.01 to 0.02 rad and results in uncertainty in the axis of misorientation between two points (Humphreys 2001) which can be very large when the misorientation angle is small (Wilkinson 2001).”
The dislocation behaviour and GND development in a nickel based superalloy during creep (2019, methodology): “Recently, EBSD has become a key tool for studying elastic [Wilkinson 2001] and plastic [El-Dahser et al., 2003, Field et al., 2005, Wilkinson et al., 2006a, Wilkinson et al., 2006b, Kamaya at al., 2006, Demir et al., 2009] strains quantitatively, by measuring the relative deformation gradient and…”
Measurement of plastic strain of polycrystalline material by electron backscatter diffraction (2005, background): “1 m and 1 m step size, the misorientation angle typically depends on distance between the measurement points, and is not always measured accurately especially when the angle is smaller than ∼1◦ (Wilkinson, 2001).”
Mapping and Assessing Plastic Deformation Using EBSD (2009, background): “( Wilkinson 2001 ). Using direct pattern analysis methods, angular resolutions down to 0.01‐0.02 ◦ can be”