Chemically induced predator avoidance behaviour in the burrowing bivalve Macoma balthica

By Charles L. Griffiths, C. Richardson. 2006

97 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/17c611b218e92cfe978dcef9bcb994bfb3a3e6c2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. S. Malham
2. T. Hutchinson
3. M. Longshaw

In Oceanography

1. S. Malham

Citations in the corpus

• Chemical ecology of predator–prey interactions in aquatic ecosystems: a review and prospectusThe present review is one in the special series of reviews on animal–plant interactions. (2010, unknown): “Griffiths and Richardson (2006) reported that the bivalve Baltic macoma (Macoma balthica) burrow in response to the odour of crabs fed conspecifics but not to the odour of crushed conspecific cues alone.”
• A review of the biology of European cockles (Cerastoderma spp.) (2012, background): “When cockles and M. balthica were exposed to chemical cues emitted from shore crabs, M. balthica responded by doubling their burial depth; cockles failed to respond to these cues making them 15 times more likely to be predated on compared with M. balthica (Griffiths & Richardson, 2006).”