Inkjet-printed graphene-PEDOT:PSS modified screen printed carbon electrode for biochemical sensing

By C. Sriprachuabwong, C. Karuwan, Anurat Wisitsorrat, D. Phokharatkul, T. Lomas, P. Sritongkham, Adisorn Tuantranont. 2012

186 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Electrochemistry, Polymers and Plastics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/17c00a6309a9c5a459ec5476298f2f1d4dedfb89

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Ben P. Dobson
2. David W. Johnson
3. K. Coleman
4. Qingli Hao
5. Wu Lei

In Electrochemistry

1. Ben P. Dobson
2. David W. Johnson
3. K. Coleman

In Polymers and Plastics

1. Wu Lei
2. Qingli Hao

Citations in the corpus

• Conducting polymer composites with graphene for use in chemical sensors and biosensors (2014, background): “5 times higher than those of unmodified and PEDOT:PSS modified SPCEs, respectively, due to the good conductivity and structure properties of graphene and PEDOT [21].”
• A manufacturing perspective on graphene dispersions (2015, background): “quality to allow the production of conducting composite inks [191].”
• Low-cost and flexible printed graphene–PEDOT:PSS gas sensor for ammonia detection (2014, background): “The electron diffraction spots are clearly visible and can be matched to that of standard crystal graphite [9,26].”