The Origins and Social Significance of Empathy-Related Responding. A Review of Empathy and Moral Development: Implications for Caring and Justice by M. L. Hoffman

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Empathy, perspective taking and personal values as predictors of moral schemas (2010, background): “…perspective taking (putting oneself in the other’s place and imagining how she or he feels) is distinct from empathy-related reactions because it lacks emotionality (e.g. Eisenberg & Morris, 2001) and thus it can enable individuals to bypass empathic arousal and bias (Hoffman, 2000; Pizarro, 2000).”
Empathy, Sympathy, and Pity: 21st-Century Definitions and Implications for Practice and Research (2011, background): “It is likely that sympathy can be evoked at any time, including time periods that follow after an empathic experience ( Eisenberg & Morris, 2001 ).”
Empathy: A Review of the Concept (2016, background): “Anatomical differences (Banissy, Kanai, Walsh, & Rees, 2012), as well as both genetic and developmental factors (Eisenberg & Morris, 2001), account for some variability in empathic abilities.”
Understanding Others: Brain Mechanisms of Theory of Mind and Empathy (2008, background): “Some behavioral and imaging evidence indeed suggests that people help others more when they report having empathized or show enhanced empathy-related brain activation with them (Eisenberg and Morris, 2001; Hein et al., 2010).”