A survey of perceptual evaluations and requirements of three-dimensional TV

By Lydia M. J. Meesters, W. Ijsselsteijn, Pieter J. H. Seuntiëns. IEEE transactions on circuits and systems for video technology (Print), 2004

354 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Media Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/17b3d3427dcfafdb074ed407c33a7f390033e415

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

1. Weisi Lin
2. Alexandre Benoit
3. Patrizio Campisi
4. P. Le Callet
5. Romain Cousseau
6. C.-C. Jay Kuo
7. Ke Gu
8. Guangtao Zhai

In Media Technology

1. Weisi Lin
2. Alexandre Benoit
3. C.-C. Jay Kuo
4. Ke Gu
5. Guangtao Zhai
6. A. Bovik
7. Che-Chun Su

Citations in the corpus

• Quality Assessment of Stereoscopic Images (2008, background): “Then, considering one 3D imaging system, e ffects such ascrosstalkbetweenviews,key-stonedistortion,depth-plane curvature, puppet theater e ffect, cardboard e ffect, shear distortion, picket-fence e ffect,and imageflipping canappear [ 12 ]. Also, compared to bidimensional data, raw stereo data repre”
• Perceptual visual quality metrics: A survey (2011, methodology): “In addition, there is a call for new methodology to assess perceptual quality of IPTV, HDTV, 3D and multi-view data, with the progress in the related technology [6,44,96,103], since most of the existing metrics are for standard-definition and single-view visual data.”