Plant–soil feedbacks of exotic plant species across life forms: a meta-analysis

89 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Impacts of invasive biota in forest ecosystems in an aboveground–belowground context (2017, background): “…may impact soil biota in such a way as to affect not only their own performance but also that of native vegetation in their new habitats; a meta-analysis by Meisner et al. (2014) revealed that native species in forests were overall adversely affected by prior soil conditioning by invasive species.”
Do native and invasive plants differ in their interactions with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi? A meta‐analysis (2015, background): “This reinforces recent arguments (Meisner et al. 2014) that adopting a more nuanced approach in invasion biology would improve predictions of plant–soil biota interactions.”
Do soil‐borne fungal pathogens mediate plant diversity–productivity relationships? Evidence and future opportunities (2020, background): “However, other studies have shown reduced biomass on soil conditioned by the same species (Harrison & Bardgett, 2010; Hendriks et al., 2013; Meisner et al., 2014) or plant functional group (Cortois, Schröder-Georgi, Weigelt, van der Putten, & Deyn, 2016; Petermann et al., 2008).”
Plant–soil feedbacks: role of plant functional group and plant traits (2016, methodology): “Meta-analytical studies have shown that the direction and effect sizes of PSF effects governed by soil microbiota appear to differ between plant functional groups (Kulmatiski et al. 2008; Meisner et al. 2014).”