Virus taxonomy : eighth report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses

By C. Fauquet, Mayo, J. Maniloff, U. Desselberger, L. Ball. 2005

5,393 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A novel pair of universal primers for the detection of potyviruses. (2010, unknown): “Plant Pathology (2009) or less than 80% amino acid (aa) identity over their coat protein sequences are considered to be from distinct species (Fauquet et al., 2005).”
Being obsessive-compulsive about terminology and nomenclature is not a vice, but a virtue (2010, unknown): “Second, the virus in question has been officially called vesicular stomatitis Indiana virus since 2005 (Fauquet et al. 2005).”
Risk profile related to production and consumption of insects as food and feed (2015, background): “they cause disease and may lead to mortality and colony collapse (Eilenberg et al., 2015; King et al., 2012).”
The NCBI Taxonomy database (2011, background): “There is also the ICTV for the viruses, which is not so much a code of nomenclature as an approved list of valid species names and classifications, maintained by a large set of committees, each responsible for a particular group of viruses (9).”
Changing patterns of chikungunya virus: re-emergence of a zoonotic arbovirus. (2007, methodology): “1; Simizu et al., 1984), while serological cross-reactivity further defined the virus and grouped CHIKV within the Semliki Forest virus (SFV) antigenic serocomplex (Table 1; Weaver et al., 2005).”