The economic valuation of farm animal genetic resources: a survey of available methods

By A. Drucker, V. Gomez, S. Anderson. 2001

144 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/17856c58c74b69e74fe55d8b9e3ab2b28678c9ae

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Eric Ruto
2. G. Garrod
3. U. Narloch
4. A. Drucker
5. U. Pascual
6. Riccardo Scarpa
7. Frank Figge
8. John M. Rose

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. U. Narloch
2. Eric Ruto
3. A. Drucker
4. U. Pascual
5. G. Garrod

Citations in the corpus

• Bio-folio: applying portfolio theory to biodiversity (2004, background): “…is then, logically, attributed to species or ecosystems being incorrectly valued (Wood 1997) or to the value and costs of conserving the species or ecosystem falling apart (Perrings 1995, p. 829; Mason 1996; Swanson 1996, 1999, p. 307; Geisendorf et al. 1998, p. 170; Drucker et al. 2001).”
• Economic evaluation of smallholder subsistence livestock production: lessons from an Ethiopian goat development program. (2003, background): “…products are often consumed, transferred or marketed, it would be inaccurate to project the economic value of the breed by estimating the expected revenue from marketable products alone, for instance in the market share procedure for estimating the economic value of a breed (Drucker et al., 2001).”
• Discriminant analysis of morphometric differentiation in the West African Dwarf and Red Sokoto goats (2011, unknown): “Conservation and sustainable development of animal genetic resources require a broad focus that includes the many adaptive breeds that survive well in the low external input agriculture typical of developing countries (Drucker et al., 2001).”
• Animal genetic resources and sustainable livelihoods (2003, background): “Drucker et al. (2001) review how market failures have led to the benefits of AnGR conservation not being captured.”
• Valuing animal genetic resources: a choice modeling application to indigenous cattle in Kenya (2007, background): “Drucker et al. (2001) and Roosen et al. (2005) argue c© 2008 International Association of Agricultural Economists that markets generally fail to completely capture the value of locally adapted AnGR as potential stocks of genes that can serve as a source for future breeding, or as source of…”
• Payments for agrobiodiversity conservation services for sustained on-farm utilization of plant and animal genetic resources (2011, background): “…is also an increasing need to appraise and prioritise those resources that are associated with important socio-cultural values for farmers but that also reflect genetic diversity of a wider portfolio, subject to the limited conservation funding available (Drucker et al., 2001; Bellon et al., 2003).”