Guest editorial: qualitative studies in information systems: a critical review and some guiding principles

By Suprateek Sarker, Xiao Xiao, Tanya Beaulieu. 2013

314 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/177a167ba6a2e0b84d5e6f1375f6b54e14a8c6c2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Dennis M. Steininger
2. Ahmed Ali Abbasi
3. Roger H. L. Chiang
4. Suprateek Sarker
5. Patrick Mikalef
6. Maryam Ghasemaghaei
7. Efstathios Stamatatos
8. John Krogstie

Citations in the corpus

• Linking information systems and entrepreneurship: A review and agenda for IT‐associated and digital entrepreneurship research (2018, methodology): “This breakdown reflects typical methodological differences among the three disciplines (Crook, Shook, Morris, & Madden, 2010; Sarker, Xiao, & Beaulieu, 2013).”
• Big Data Research in Information Systems: Toward an Inclusive Research Agenda (2016, background): “On the other hand, many scholars argue that, in the absence of theory, data lacks “order, sense and meaning” and that “theories without data are empty; data without theories are blind” (Harrington, 2005, p. 5, cited in Sarker et al., 2013, p. xiiii).”