Quantum memories - A review based on the European integrated project “Qubit Applications (QAP)”

By C. Simon, M. Afzelius, J. Appel, A. D. L. Giroday, S. J. Dewhurst, N. Gisin, C. Hu, Fedor Jelezko, S. Kröll, J. H. Müller and 14 more. 2010

383 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We perform a review of various approaches to the implementation of quantum memories, with an emphasis on activities within the quantum memory sub-project of the EU integrated project “Qubit Applications”. We begin with a brief overview over different applications for quantum memories and different types of quantum memories. We discuss the most important criteria for assessing quantum memory performance and the most important physical requirements. Then we review the different approaches represented in “Qubit Applications” in some detail. They include solid-state atomic ensembles, NV centers, quantum dots, single atoms, atomic gases and optical phonons in diamond. We compare the different approaches using the discussed criteria.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1777583413c85ae7d265aede7c1ee0bf0afbfd87

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Christopher R. Monroe
  2. Dirk Englund
  3. Jungsang Kim
  4. Mikhail D. Lukin
  5. Michael G. Raymer
  6. J. Nunn
  7. R. Walsworth
  8. A. Safavi-Naeini

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. Dirk Englund
  2. Mikhail D. Lukin
  3. Christopher R. Monroe
  4. R. Walsworth
  5. Jungsang Kim
  6. J. Nunn
  7. Kartik Srinivasan
  8. David D. Awschalom

Citations in the corpus