Corrigendum: Negative quasi-probability as a resource for quantum computation

252 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The full text of this article is available in the PDF provided.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Many-Body Quantum Magic (2020, background): “[22] Victor Veitch, Christopher Ferrie, David Gross, and Joseph Emerson, “Negative quasi-probability as a resource for quantum computation,” New Journal of Physics 14, 113011 (2012).”
Quantum resource theories (2018, background): “It was shown by Veitch et al. (2012) that the action of a stabilizer operation on any state with a non-negative discrete Wigner function can be efficiently simulated by a classical computer.”
Wigner Function Negativity and Contextuality in Quantum Computation on Rebits (2014, background): “[27] have expanded this result to all (pure and mixed) states that have positive Wigner functions.”
Simulation of quantum circuits by low-rank stabilizer decompositions (2018, methodology): “A over similar class of simulation methods uses Monte Carlo sampling quasiprobability distributions, where the distribution can be over either a discrete phase space [20, 47, 56], over the class of stabilizer states [32] or over stabilizer operations [7].”
Harnessing the Power of the Second Quantum Revolution (2020, background): “This new understanding grew out of a series of new (and/or re-examined) concepts including entanglement [2,3,13–16], contextuality [17–19], negativity of quasiprobabilities [20–22], deco-herence [4], no-cloning [23], and quantum trajectories [11,12,24,25].”