The Impact of Obesity on Wages
By J. Cawley. The Journal of human resources, 2004
1,143 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Pharmacy, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/17705f6367dab176e42f8adfffe2e2ac0ddd8deb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Pharmacy
In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Citations in the corpus
- Biology and Management: A Review, Critique, and Research Agenda (2018, neutral): “Researchers have also found a relationship between body weight (Agerstrom & Rooth, 2011; Cawley, 2004; Re, Dzhelyova, Holzleitner, Tigue, Feinberg, & Perrett, 2012) and voice (Klofstad, Anderson, & Nowicki, 2015; Klofstad, Anderson, & Peters, 2012; Klofstad, Nowicki, & Anderson, 2016) and various or”
- The Stigma of Obesity: A Review and Update (2009, methodology): “…using National Longitudinal Survey of Youth data ( N = 25,843) found that for white females, an increase of 64 pounds above average weight was associated with a 9% decrease in wages, which was approximately equivalent to the difference of 1.5 years of education or 3 years of work experience (13).”
- Does Size Matter in Australia (2010, methodology): “Studies on height and wages have found a positive relationship in Brazil (Thomas & Strauss, 1997), the UK (Harper, 2000; Case & Paxson, 2008; Case et al., 2009), and the USA (Loh, 1993; Persico et al., 2004; Case & Paxson, 2008).”
- Unexplored dimensions of discrimination in Europe: homosexuality and physical appearance (2015, neutral): “[36] Cawley, J.”
- The Effects of Food Stamps on Obesity (2011, neutral): “Perhaps it is surprising that male BMI is ever higher than female BMI because NHANES data shows the opposite, but this appears to be a characteristic unique to the NLSY79 cohort also found by others (Cawley 2004).”
- The medical care costs of obesity: an instrumental variables approach. (2012, positive): “We are unable to test whether these are problems in the current context, and can only follow the previous literature (e.g. Smith et al., 2009; Kline and Tobias 2008; Cawley, 2004) in acknowledging them as possible limitations of the instrument.”