Universality of the SAT-UNSAT (jamming) threshold in non-convex continuous constraint satisfaction problems

By Silvio Franz, Giorgio Parisi, Maksim Sevelev, Pierfrancesco Urbani, Francesco Zamponi. 2017

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Random constraint satisfaction problems (CSP) have been studied extensively using statistical physics techniques. They provide a benchmark to study average case scenarios instead of the worst case one. The interplay between statistical physics of disordered systems and computer science has brought new light into the realm of computational complexity theory, by introducing the notion of clustering of solutions, related to replica symmetry breaking. However, the class of problems in which clustering has been studied often involve discrete degrees of freedom: standard random CSPs are random K-SAT (aka disordered Ising models) or random coloring problems (aka disordered Potts models). In this work we consider instead problems that involve continuous degrees of freedom. The simplest prototype of these problems is the perceptron. Here we discuss in detail the full phase diagram of the model. In the regions of parameter space where the problem is non-convex, leading to multiple disconnected clusters of solutions, the solution is critical at the SAT/UNSAT threshold and lies in the same universality class of the jamming transition of soft spheres. We show how the critical behavior at the satisfiability threshold emerges, and we compute the critical exponents associated to the approach to the transition from both the SAT and UNSAT phase. We conjecture that there is a large universality class of non-convex continuous CSPs whose SAT-UNSAT threshold is described by the same scaling solution.

Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Condensed Matter Physics, Statistics and Probability, Scaling & Learning Theory

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

  1. Stefano Spigler
  2. Stéphane d'Ascoli
  3. Giulio Biroli
  4. Levent Sagun
  5. Matthieu Wyart
  6. Francesco Zamponi
  7. Mario Geiger
  8. Carolina Brito

In Condensed Matter Physics

  1. Pierfrancesco Urbani
  2. Francesco Zamponi
  3. Stefano Spigler
  4. Matthieu Wyart
  5. Giulio Biroli
  6. Mario Geiger
  7. Levent Sagun
  8. Stéphane d'Ascoli

In Statistics and Probability

  1. Clément Hongler
  2. Stefano Spigler
  3. Stéphane d'Ascoli
  4. Giulio Biroli
  5. Levent Sagun
  6. Matthieu Wyart
  7. Francesco Zamponi
  8. Mario Geiger

In Scaling & Learning Theory

  1. Matthieu Wyart
  2. Mario Geiger
  3. Stefano Spigler
  4. Arthur Jacot
  5. Levent Sagun
  6. Stéphane d'Ascoli
  7. Giulio Biroli
  8. Clément Hongler

Citations in the corpus