To sample or eradicate? A cost minimization model for monitoring and managing an invasive species
By T. Bogich, Andrew M. Liebhold, Katriona Shea. 2008
151 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Insect Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1767c638d1c0056124abb1650ca47bd331c562c5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Petr Pyšek
- Jan Pergl
- E. Brockerhoff
- R. Epanchin‐Niell
- S. Bacher
- B. Richardson
- V. Jarošı́k
- D. Suckling
In Insect Science
- Petr Pyšek
- Jan Pergl
- V. Jarošı́k
- E. Brockerhoff
- R. Epanchin‐Niell
- Andrew M. Liebhold
- B. Richardson
- S. Bacher
Citations in the corpus
- Economics of invasive species policy and management (2017, background): “…in different contexts, including one-time survey programs and long-term surveillance efforts (e.g., Kaiser and Burnett 2010; Mehta et al. 2007; Bogich et al. 2008; Homans and Horie 2011; Epanchin-Niell et al. 2012, 2014; Horie et al. 2013; Cacho and Hester 2011; Moore and McCarthy 2016;…”
- When are eradication campaigns successful? A test of common assumptions (2012, background): “For campaigns in the United States and Canada, measures affecting an entire state or province were also classified as ''national''.”
- Eradication of invasive forest insects: concepts, methods, costs and benefits (2010, methodology): “Bogich et al. (2008) used mathematical models to show that in the case of a gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar (L.)) incursion, moderate investment in both detection and eradication provided the best outcome.”