Validation of wearable monitors for assessing sedentary behavior.

By Sarah Kozey-Keadle, Amanda Libertine, K. Lyden, John W. Staudenmayer, Patty S. Freedson. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2011

856 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1754ad6b6205ad3ab427476f48c025ca3438c1c5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. V. Matsudo
2. O. Luiz
3. J. Rey-López
4. Leandro Fórnias Machado de Rezende

Citations in the corpus

• Sedentary behavior and health outcomes among older adults: a systematic review (2014, methodology): “When using accelerometers, future studies should clearly specify the criteria established for non-wear time [56] and use the most accurate sedentary cut-points (150 counts/min) [57] to avoid misclassification.”
• Accelerometer Data Collection and Processing Criteria to Assess Physical Activity and Other Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Practical Considerations (2017, unknown): “Therefore, less time in SED and more time in all PA intensities were observed with the LFE filter due to the influence on activity counts.”
• Age group comparability of raw accelerometer output from wrist- and hip-worn monitors. (2014, unknown): “time with a single-mounted accelerometer (15,20,28).”