Random Projection, Margins, Kernels, and Feature-Selection
By Avrim Blum. 2005
134 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Statistical Learning Theory
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Bernhard Schölkopf
- Eric P. Xing
- Barnab'as P'oczos
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
- Yoshua Bengio
- Bharath K. Sriperumbudur
- Sergey Levine
- Krikamol Muandet
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Luc Van Gool
- Dacheng Tao
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
- Trevor Darrell
- Jitendra Malik
- Xiaogang Wang
- Andrea Vedaldi
- Andrew Zisserman
In Statistical Learning Theory
- Bharath K. Sriperumbudur
- Kenji Fukumizu
- Bernhard Schölkopf
- Krikamol Muandet
- Arthur Gretton
- Barnab'as P'oczos
- Balaji Lakshminarayanan
- Dino Sejdinovic
Citations in the corpus
- Kernel Mean Embedding of Distributions: A Review and Beyonds (2016, background): “If elements of W are drawn from an appropriate distribution p(w), the Johnson-Lindenstrauss Lemma (Dasgupta and Gupta 2003, Blum 2005) ensures that this transformation will preserve similarity between data points.”
- Simple and Principled Uncertainty Estimation with Deterministic Deep Learning via Distance Awareness (2020, background): “Finally, it is worth noting that preserving such approximate isometry in a neural network is possible even after significant dimensionality reduction (Blum, 2006; Hauser and Ray, 2017; Perrault-Joncas, 2017; Rousseau et al., 2020).”
- FastMMD: Ensemble of Circular Discrepancy for Efficient Two-Sample Test (2014, methodology): “In this section, we give a geometric explanation for our methods by using random projection (Blum, 2006) on a circle and circular discrepancy.”
- Stronger generalization bounds for deep nets via a compression approach (2018, methodology): “Similar approach was discussed by Blum [2006] for linear classifiers.”
- Top Accuracy and Fast Dependency Parsing is not a Contradiction (2010, methodology): “This procedure is similar to randomization of weights (features), which aims to save space by sharing values in the weight vector (Blum., 2006; Rahimi and Recht, 2008).”
- Compressed Least-Squares Regression (2009, background): “In [6, 17], the authors show how to map a kernel k(x, y) = φ(x) · φ(y) into a low-dimensional space, while still approximately preserving the inner products.”
- Adaptive Affinity Field for Semantic Segmentation (2018, background): “One example of projections is the random projection [29].”
- Robust Domain Generalisation by Enforcing Distribution Invariance (2016, methodology): “A more recent trend explores the use of randomisation, such as linear random projection [Blum, 2006] as a substitute for the computationally expensive step of kernel matrix construction.”
- Improper Deep Kernels (2016, unknown): “Consider for example, Theorem 5 in [3].”
- TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at Scale (2023, unknown): “Our application of random projections to improve computational efficiency of kernel approximation is a widely used idea in kernel methods (Blum, 2006; Rahimi & Recht, 2007).”
- Compact Random Feature Maps (2013, background): “To solve this challenge, several schemes have been proposed to explicitly approximate the kernel matrix, including low-rank approximations (Blum, 2006) (Bach & Jordan, 2005), sampling individual entries (Achliop-tas et al., 2002), or discarding entire rows (Drineas & Mahoney, 2005).”
- Bayesian Nonparametric Kernel-Learning (2015, methodology): “Other approaches for summarizing the Gram matrix by the removal of elements or rows have been explored in [21, 5, 9, 22].”