Institutional drivers of high-growth firms: country-level evidence from 26 transition economies
By B. Krasniqi, S. Desai. 2016
154 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/174662a8925b605961a5822b7b14329c3c2d2267
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Ross Brown
- David Urbano
- Sebastian Aparicio
- Colin Mason
- David B. Audretsch
- Suzanne Mawson
- Simona Mateut
- Lucio Fuentelsaz
In Economics and Econometrics
- David Urbano
- Sebastian Aparicio
- Ross Brown
- Colin Mason
- David B. Audretsch
- Suzanne Mawson
- Simona Mateut
- Lucio Fuentelsaz
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Sebastian Aparicio
- David Urbano
- Ross Brown
- David B. Audretsch
- Colin Mason
- Suzanne Mawson
- Lucio Fuentelsaz
- Juan Pablo Maicas
Citations in the corpus
- Subsidies, financial constraints and firm innovative activities in emerging economies (2017, background): “See Krasniqi and Desai (2016) for a detailed country-level analysis of institutional drivers of high-growth firms.”
- Formal Institutions and Opportunity Entrepreneurship. The Contingent Role of Informal Institutions (2019, background): “On the contrary, weak formal institutions can constitute an important limitation for entrepreneurship and, in particular, for the growth and quality of business initiatives (Krasniqi and Desai, 2016).”
- Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: what has been learned? (2019, background): “% García-Posada and Mora-Sanguinetti (2015), Krasniqi and Desai (2016), Levie and Autio (2008), Meek et al. (2010), Nyström (2008).”
- Myth-busting and entrepreneurship policy: the case of high growth firms (2017, background): “HGFs in developing or transition contexts are recognised to differ somewhat from those within OECD countries given issues like institutional factors (Krasniqi and Desai, 2016) and thus require further investigation.”