Feature Classes in Phonology

By Jaye Padgett. 2002

69 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/173c8e8eddee3c68fcacc03f26fc28f72f94b0c9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. John J. McCarthy
2. Todd M. Bailey
3. Ulrike Hahn
4. Bruce Hayes
5. R. Meşter
6. Andries W. Coetzee
7. Colin Wilson
8. Joe Pater

In Language and Linguistics

1. John J. McCarthy
2. Todd M. Bailey
3. Ulrike Hahn
4. R. Meşter
5. Joe Pater
6. Paul Smolensky
7. Bruce Tesar

Citations in the corpus

• OT constraints are categorical (2003, background): “For example, the gradient constraints IDENT[colour] and SPREAD [colour] in Padgett (2002) are superfluous if there are categorical IDENT constraints for each of the vowel-colour features [back] and [round].”
• Phoneme similarity and confusability (2005, background): “Featural representations of speech sounds were developed originally to explain natural classes, that is, sets of phonemes that behave like members of a single category in phonological patterns (see Kenstowicz, 1994 for an introduction; see Padgett, 2002 for a recent linguistic analysis of features”