Robust Lasso With Missing and Grossly Corrupted Observations

By Nam H. Nguyen, Trac Duy Tran. 2011

168 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This paper studies the problem of accurately recovering a <formula formulatype="inline"><tex Notation="TeX">$k$</tex> </formula>-sparse vector <formula formulatype="inline"><tex Notation="TeX">$\beta^{\star}\in\BBR^{p}$</tex> </formula> from highly corrupted linear measurements <formula formulatype="inline"><tex Notation="TeX">$y=X\beta^{\star}+e^{\star}+w$</tex> </formula>, where <formula formulatype="inline"> <tex Notation="TeX">$e^{\star}\in\BBR^{n}$</tex></formula> is a sparse error vector whose nonzero entries may be unbounded and <formula formulatype="inline"><tex Notation="TeX">$w$</tex></formula> is a stochastic noise term. We propose a so-called extended Lasso optimization which takes into consideration sparse prior information of both <formula formulatype="inline"><tex Notation="TeX">$\beta^{\star}$</tex> </formula> and <formula formulatype="inline"> <tex Notation="TeX">$e^{\star}$</tex></formula>. Our first result shows that the extended Lasso can faithfully recover both the regression as well as the corruption vector. Our analysis relies on the notion of extended restricted eigenvalue for the design matrix <formula formulatype="inline"><tex Notation="TeX">$X$</tex></formula>. Our second set of results applies to a general class of Gaussian design matrix <formula formulatype="inline"><tex Notation="TeX">$X$</tex> </formula> with i.i.d. rows <formula formulatype="inline"><tex Notation="TeX">${\cal N}(0,\Sigma)$</tex></formula>, for which we can establish a surprising result: the extended Lasso can recover exact signed supports of both <formula formulatype="inline"> <tex Notation="TeX">$\beta^{\star}$</tex></formula> and <formula formulatype="inline"><tex Notation="TeX">$e^{\star}$</tex> </formula> from only <formula formulatype="inline"> <tex Notation="TeX">$\Omega(k\log p\log n)$</tex></formula> observations, even when a linear fraction of observations is grossly corrupted. Our analysis also shows that this amount of observations required to achieve exact signed support is indeed optimal.

Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Mathematical Physics, Statistics and Probability, Optimization & Training

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Mechanics

  1. Purushottam Kar
  2. Prateek Jain
  3. Kush Bhatia
  4. Jerry Zheng Li
  5. Parameswaran Kamalaruban
  6. Trac Duy Tran
  7. Nam H. Nguyen
  8. Tien-Ping Tan

In Mathematical Physics

  1. Purushottam Kar
  2. Prateek Jain
  3. Stanislav Minsker
  4. Kush Bhatia
  5. Parameswaran Kamalaruban
  6. Zeyuan Allen-Zhu
  7. Ran He
  8. Gautam Kamath

In Statistics and Probability

  1. Ilias Diakonikolas
  2. Alistair Stewart
  3. Daniel M. Kane
  4. Jerry Zheng Li
  5. Jacob Steinhardt
  6. Gautam Kamath
  7. Prateek Jain
  8. Purushottam Kar

In Optimization & Training

  1. Ilias Diakonikolas
  2. Alistair Stewart
  3. Jacob Steinhardt
  4. Jerry Zheng Li
  5. Prateek Jain
  6. Daniel M. Kane
  7. Purushottam Kar
  8. Gautam Kamath

Citations in the corpus