A NEW SPECIES OF ARARIPESUCHUS (CROCODYLOMORPHA, MESOEUCROCODYLIA) FROM THE LOWER CRETACEOUS OF PATAGONIA (ARGENTINA)

By Francisco Ortega, Z. Gasparini, Á. Buscalioni, Jorge O. Calvo. 2000

202 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Nature and Landscape Conservation, Paleontology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/16fdfdc733b2828e54226f502404ebbc28c7e825

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. A. Turner
2. J. Sertich
3. Marco Brandalise de Andrade
4. D. Pol
5. S. Jouve
6. H. Larsson
7. G. Buckley
8. M. Young

In Paleontology

1. A. Turner
2. J. Sertich
3. Marco Brandalise de Andrade
4. D. Pol
5. S. Jouve
6. H. Larsson
7. Paul C. Sereno
8. M. Young

Citations in the corpus

• Cretaceous Crocodyliforms from the Sahara (2009, background): “patagonicus is unusual in this regard, with the posterior margin of the choana positioned farther anteriorly than the posterior margin of the suborbital fenestra, although breakage may have arti" cially expanded the fenestra (Ortega et al. 2000).”
• Craniofacial Morphology of Simosuchus clarki (Crocodyliformes: Notosuchia) from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar (2010, unknown): “267, 269, 270, 283; Ortega et al, 2000 ); Araripesuchus tsangatsangana (FMNH nos.”
• A new Berriasian species of Goniopholis (Mesoeucrocodylia, Neosuchia) from England, and a review of the genus (2011, methodology): “…2008a, b; Young & Andrade, 2009); (2) a monophyletic Sebecosuchia is not supported (as in Clark, 1994; contra Ortega et al., 2000), although the clade Sebecia is (as in Larsson & Sues, 2007); (3) both Notosuchia (sensu Gasparini, 1971) and Ziphosuchia (sensu Ortega et al., 2000) are also supported.”
• Baurusuchid crocodyliforms as theropod mimics: clues from the skull and appendicular morphology of Stratiotosuchus maxhechti (Upper Cretaceous of Brazil) (2011, unknown): “…have found a monophyletic Sebecosuchia, related to, or inserted within the Notosuchia (Gasparini, Fernandez & Powell, 1993; Gomani, 1997; Ortega et al., 2000; Pol, 2003; Company et al., 2005; Turner & Calvo, 2005; Turner, 2006; Gasparini, Pol & Spalletti, 2006; Nascimento & Zaher, 2011,…”
• What is Geosaurus? Redescription of Geosaurus giganteus (Thalattosuchia: Metriorhynchidae) from the Upper Jurassic of Bayern, Germany (2009, background): “…elliptic pits, rather than the subpolygonal pits and deep grooves usually seen in neosuchians, peirosaurids, and Araripesuchus (Benton & Clark, 1988; Clark, 1994; Ortega et al., 2000), or the irregular pattern of shallow sulci found in most notosuchians (Bonaparte, 1991; Carvalho & Bertini, 1999).”
• New Araripesuchus Remains from the Early Late Cretaceous (Cenomanian–Turonian) of Patagonia (2005, methodology): “55 by Ortega et al., 2000: char.”
• An armadillo-like sphagesaurid crocodyliform from the Late Cretaceous of Brazil (2009, background): “Mesoeucrocodylian remains are common finds in the Late Cretaceous Bauru Basin in Southeastern Brazil (Nobre and Carvalho, 2006), and the Notosuchia (sensu Ortega et al., 2000) are the most commonly found crocodylomorphs in this unit.”
• Late Cretaceous crocodile remains from Naskal (India): comparisons and biogeographic affinities (2002, background): “They were attributed to Araripesuchus Price, 1959, a genus from the early Cretaceous of Araripe, Brazil and Argentina (Ortega et al., 2000; Price, 1959) which is not a ziphodont.”
• A new species of Baurusuchus (Crocodyliformes, Mesoeucrocodylia) from the Upper Cretaceous of Brazil, with the first complete postcranial skeleton described for the family Baurusuchidae (2010, background): “In recent phylogenies, the family Baurusuchidae has been consistently found to be nested within No‐ tosuchia (Ortega et al., 2000; Sereno et al., 2003; Pol, 2003; Pol & Norell, 2004; Pol & Apesteguia, 2005; Gasparini et al., 2005; Zaher et al., 2006; Andrade & Bertini, 2008), a clade originally erec”
• The Skull of Teleosaurus cadomensis (Crocodylomorpha; Thalattosuchia), and Phylogenetic Analysis of Thalattosuchia (2009, methodology): “[Modified from Pol, 1999 (166); Pol and Norell, 2004 (150), modified from Ortega et al., 2000 (44)].”
• Phylogenetic History of Simosuchus clarki (Crocodyliformes: Notosuchia) from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar (2010, background): “55 by Ortega et al., 2000: char.”
• A new Sphagesaurus (Mesoeucrocodylia: Notosuchia) from the Upper Cretaceous of Monte Alto City (Bauru Group, Brazil), and a revision of the Sphagesauridae (2008, methodology): “The data was based on Andrade (2005), composed of both new and previously used characters (Benton and Clark 1988; Clark 1994; Gomani 1997; Buckley et al. 2000; Ortega et al. 2000; Martinelli 2003; Pol 2003; Sereno et al. 2003) (Appendix C).”
• LATE CRETACEOUS TERRESTRIAL VERTEBRATES FROM MADAGASCAR: IMPLICATIONS FOR LATIN AMERICAN BIOGEOGRAPHY1 (2006, unknown): “Sereno et al. (2003) additionally recognized an expanded concept of Notosuchia, roughly equivalent to the Ziphosuchia proposed by Ortega et al. (2000), by including Comahuesuchus, Anatosuchus, and Baurusuchus + Sebecus Simpson.”
• A new species of Dyrosaurus (Crocodylomorpha, Dyrosauridae) from the early Eocene of Morocco: phylogenetic implications (2006, background): “The sebecosuchians are often included in Notosuchia (Gomani, 1997; Ortega et al., 2000; Sereno et al., 2001, 2003; Tykoski et al., 2002; Pol, 2003; Pol & Norell, 2004a, b; Pol et al., 2004; Turner & Calvo, 2005), but are considered as more primitive mesoeucrocodylians (paraphyletic) in Benton & Clar”
• Redescription of the Cranial Morphology of Mariliasuchus Amarali, and Its Phylogenetic Affinities (crocodyliformes, Notosuchia) (2006, background): “Character 191 (Ortega et al., 2000; character 72).”
• The evolution of jaw mechanism and dental function in heterodont crocodyliforms (2014, unknown): “Araripesuchus patagonicus (Ortega et al. 2000)], then it is”