Can “Tax-for-Fee” Reform Reduce Rural Tension in China? The Process, Progress and Limitations

By R. Yep. The China Quarterly, 2004

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/16f89ff09778d7308f734bb33a809ec489585ef0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. M. Lindelow
2. X. Ling
3. Adam Wagstaff
4. J. Qian
5. Gao Jun

Citations in the corpus

• Public Governance, Corporate Governance, and Firm Innovation: An Examination of State-Owned Enterprises (2019, unknown): “In addition, they constitute the dominant financial burden of Chinese peasants, which has become one of the central issues that exemplify the excessive fiscal predation by local governments (e.g., Yep, 2004; Fan, Wang, & Zhu, 2011).”
• Extending health insurance to the rural population: an impact evaluation of China's new cooperative medical scheme. (2007, background): “In order to reduce the tax and fee burden of rural residents, the government has eliminated a number of rural taxes and reduced others (Yep, 2004; Lin, 2005).”