Inclusive charmed-meson production at the CERN LHC
By Bernd A. Kniehl, G. Kramer, I. Schienbein, H. Spiesberger. 2012
203 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We present predictions for the inclusive production of D mesons at the CERN LHC in the general-mass variable-flavor-number scheme at next-to-leading order. Detailed numerical results are compared to data where available, or presented in a way to ease future comparisons with experimental results. We also point out that measurements at large rapidity have the potential to pin down models of intrinsic charm.
Subfields: Nuclear and High Energy Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/16ef63a72f81476ec248dc082105d48e15831a36
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Alice Collaboration
- Cms Collaboration
- Atlas Collaboration
- P. Nason
- J. Stachel
- Juan Rojo
- P. Braun-Munzinger
- E. Re
Citations in the corpus
- Measurement of D-meson production at mid-rapidity in pp collisions at √s=7 TeV (2017, methodology): “The cross section is compared to three pQCD calculations: FONLL [7] (top-left panel), GM-VFNS [5] (top-right panel) and a leading order (LO) calculation based on kT-factorisation [9] (bottom panel).”
- The Structure of the Proton in the LHC Precision Era (2017, background): “Another important process where non–perturbative charm could play a role is open D meson production [512, 513], in particular at large pT and at forward rapidities, which enhance the sensitivity to the large–x region.”
- Λ c + production in pp collisions at √s=7 TeV and in p-Pb collisions at √sNN=5.02 TeV (2017, background): “9 (left) our measurement in pp collisions is compared with GM-VFNS perturbative QCD calculations [1,2] and with the results of the POWHEG event generator [9].”
- Theoretical predictions for charm and bottom production at the LHC (2012, background): “Predictions can now therefore be evaluated within different frameworks (see also [28, 29] for an independent analysis) and compared among themselves as well as with the data.”