Preferences and the Democratic Peace
By Erik Gartzke. 2000
232 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Development, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/16eaee3ce75bab2196a586b8ff484c128cb50a6e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Development
- Jon C. W. Pevehouse
- Paul Ingram
- Edward D. Mansfield
- M. Busch
- W. H. Kaempfer
- Scott Gartner
- A. Lowenberg
- Helen V. Milner
In Sociology and Political Science
- Edward D. Mansfield
- Jon C. W. Pevehouse
- Jeffrey A. Robinson
- Paul Ingram
- W. H. Kaempfer
- Scott Gartner
- A. Lowenberg
- Dany Jaimovich
Citations in the corpus
- Trade Blocs, Trade Flows, and International Conflict (2000, background): “Gasiorowski 1986.”
- Evaluating the Nuclear Peace Hypothesis (2009, unknown): “For quantitative work on the Democratic Peace Theory (DPT), see Babst (1964, 1972), Pevehouse and Russett (2006), gartzke (1998, 2000), Lake (1992), Oneal and Russett (1997), Russett and Oneal (2001a, 2001b), Maoz (1997, 1998), Oneal et al. (1996), Risse-Kappen (1995), Russett (1993), and Singer…”
- The Intergovernmental Network of World Trade: IGO Connectedness, Governance, and Embeddedness1 (2005, background): “Bilateral affinity, a variable created by Gartzke (2000), is “the rank order IGOs and World Trade correlation of states’ voting in the United Nations General Assembly. . . . [As it] increases two states are thought to share more interests in common” (Russett and Oneal 2001, p. 231).”
- The Political Economy of Economic Sanctions (2007, background): “Gartzke (2000) attributes much of the lack of militarized disputes between democracies to preference similarity across democratic states, while Siverson and Emmons (1991) document a high rate of alliance formation among democracies.”
- The Multiple Effects of Casualties on Public Support for War: An Experimental Approach (2008, background): “The relationship between casualties and approval represents a critical link in arguments about the democratic peace (Gartzke 1998, 2000; Kadera et al. 2003; Russett 1990; Siverson 1995), diversionary theory arguments (Baum 2002), and war outcome (Sullivan 2006).”