Analysis of matched mRNA measurements from two different microarray technologies

494 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Evaluation of gene expression measurements from commercial microarray platforms. (2003, background): “Previous comparisons of microarray formats suggested that expression data on the NCI60 cell lines from spotted cDNA mircroarrays could not be directly combined with data from synthesized oligonucleotide arrays ( 5 ).”
Comprehensive literature review and statistical considerations for microarray meta-analysis (2012, methodology): “Simple Pearson correlation and Venn diagrams have been widely used (52–55).”
Microarray results: how accurate are they? (2002, background): “Previously, such systematic differences in the two technologies were reported [6].”
PAGE: Parametric Analysis of Gene Set Enrichment (2005, unknown): “While individual microarray studies can be highly informative, it is generally difficult to compare independently obtained data sets addressing the same biological problem [18], regardless of whether the same or different microarray platform was used [19-23].”
Coexpression analysis of human genes across many microarray data sets. (2004, background): “Cancer Institute reference tumor cell lines (NCI-60) but on two different microarray platforms, found that clustering results were not reproducible (Kuo et al. 2002).”