Comparative randomized trial of an online cognitive-behavioral therapy program and an online support group for depression and anxiety

By Andrew J. Campbell, L. Ellis, Bridianne O'Dea, Suvena Sethi. 2011

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/16d0a8b73e8ccbe3e50ae6f6f9d4285d33e5009b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. E. Lattie
2. PhD Elizabeth C Adkins
3. Nathan Winquist
4. E. B. Davies
5. C. Stiles-Shields
6. C. Glazebrook
7. PhD Q Eileen Wafford
8. M. A. K. G. Mst

Citations in the corpus

• Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review (2018, background): “Most studies included were focused on either universal prevention programs (n=36 [43,48,53,54,63-67,70-73,75-78,90,91, 94,95,97,99,100,102,106-108,110-112,114,118,119,125,126]), or on treatment intervention programs (n=22 [41,49,50,52, 58,69,74,79,80,83-86,88,89,92,98,113,117,120,122,127]).”
• Computer-Delivered and Web-Based Interventions to Improve Depression, Anxiety, and Psychological Well-Being of University Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2014, background): “Five trials compared intervention to inactive (ie, no treatment or waitlist control) and either an active control [53] or comparison intervention [28,47,50,52], five trialed the intervention to an active control [44,45,55-57], six trialed against inactive control [42,46,48,49,51,54], and one compare”