OGRS 3:the revised Offender Group Reconviction Scale
By P. Howard, B. Francis, K. Soothill, L. Humphreys. 2009
90 citations recorded by the source corpus.
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Cynthia Rudin
- Berk Ustun
- Jiaming Zeng
- Tong Wang
- Lesia Semenova
- P. V. D. van der Heijden
- N. Tollenaar
- Nadia Burkart
Citations in the corpus
- Interpretable classification models for recidivism prediction (2015, background): “Countries that currently use risk assessment tools include: Canada (Hanson and Thornton 2003); the Netherlands (Tollenaar and van der Heijden 2013); the U.K. (Howard et al. 2009); and the U.S (Turner et al. 2009).”
- Optimized Scoring Systems: Toward Trust in Machine Learning for Healthcare and Criminal Justice (2018, methodology): “One of the latest public guidelines for recidivism risk prediction in the United States is the Pennsylvania Commission on Sentencing (Pennsylvania Commission on Sentencing 2012), and other methods are used in Canada (Hanson and Thornton 2003), the Netherlands (Tollenaar and van der Heijden 2013), an”
- Which method predicts recidivism best?: a comparison of statistical, machine learning and data mining predictive models (2013, background): “Since then, the OGRS has undergone two major revisions expanding it with more risk factors (Maden et al. , 2005; Howard et al. , 2009).”