Geodesy constraints on the interior structure and composition of Mars

By A. Rivoldini, T. Hoolst, O. Verhoeven, A. Mocquet, Véronique Dehant. 2011

223 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/16b4f0de15ff2d2945341353b3fb2d9bf5e107fc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. Mark A. Wieczorek
2. F. Nimmo
3. Y. Alibert
4. W. Benz
5. Amir Khan
6. Philippe Lognonné
7. T. O. S. University
8. Research School of Earth Sciences

In Molecular Biology

1. F. Nimmo
2. Paul J. Tackley
3. J. A. Connolly
4. Philippe Lognonné
5. Mark A. Wieczorek
6. U. Christensen
7. Julien Aubert
8. Johannes Wicht

Citations in the corpus

• Can we constrain the interior structure of rocky exoplanets from mass and radius measurements (2015, result): “Comparing our results to models with pure iron cores (Rivoldini et al. 2011; Khan & Connolly 2008), reduces discrepancy.”
• The seismicity of Mars (2020, methodology): “The latter was composed of an adiabatic liquid iron alloy core (with the light element assumed to be sulfur, see Rivoldini et al. (2011), surrounded by a silicate envelope.”
• The composition of Mars (2019, result): “, 2016) and FeO (Lee and Gaskell, 1974; Komabayashi, 2014) and solid FeH (Umemoto and Hirose, 2015) at core pressures and temperatures and a third-order finite strain Birch-Murnaghan or Vinet equation of state (Stixrude and Lithgow-Bertelloni, 2005), following previous studies (Longhi et al., 1992; ”