Immigrant Entrepreneurship and the Institutional Context: A Theoretical Exploration
By R. Kloosterman. 2000
126 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/168a40f093f95cc6db216be8462ec802f4232ddb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management of Technology and Innovation
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Immigrant entrepreneurs in advanced economies: Mixed embeddedness further explored (2001, background): “Although urban policy is usually launched as a national initiative, individual city governments often have considerable leeway to implement and to enforce these national urban measures in ways they see ® t (Dieleman and Kloosterman 2000; PoleÁ se 2000).”
- 'Breaking in' and 'breaking out': A Weberian approach to entrepreneurial opportunities (2001, methodology): “1 This approach was developed in close co-operation with Robert Kloosterman and Jan Rath (see Kloosterman 2000; Kloosterman and Rath 2000).”
- Matching opportunities with resources: A framework for analysing (migrant) entrepreneurship from a mixed embeddedness perspective (2010, methodology): “We are, hence, applying insights from comparative political economy to construct an approach of immigrant entrepreneurship that enables us to explain cross-border differences as well as changes over time (Kloosterman 2000; Engelen 2004).”
- Creating opportunities. Policies aimed at increasing openings for immigrant entrepreneurs in the Netherlands (2003, background): “Judging by these figures, a rather optimistic picture emerges of recent trends in immigrant entrepreneurship in the Netherlands (cf. Rath and Kloosterman 2000).”
- Explaining Variations in Business Performance Among Immigrant Entrepreneurs in Canada (2006, background): “This British experience is projected more broadly by Kloosterman (2000) to the Western European welfare states where a somewhat regulated institutional structure ‘funnels immigrant entrepreneurs towards sunset activities in vacancy-chain businesses, competing fiercely in shrinking markets with littl”