Measurement of trust in human-robot collaboration

By A. Freedy, Ewart de Visser, G. Weltman, Nicole Coeyman. 2007 International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems, 2007

309 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

When stereotypes meet robots: The double-edge sword of robot gender and personality in human-robot interaction (2014, background): “As in cases concerning the implementation of automated technology (Freedy et al., 2007; Lee & Moray, 1994; Parasuraman & Riley, 1997), trust is an important factor in user acceptance of social robots.”
Would You Trust a (Faulty) Robot? Effects of Error, Task Type and Personality on Human-Robot Cooperation and Trust (2015, background): “Trust is fundamental in social contexts, as it is tightly linked to persuasiveness and can directly affect people’s willingness to accept information provided by the robot and to follow its suggestions [8].”
Towards a Theory of Longitudinal Trust Calibration in Human–Robot Teams (2019, background): “Trust measurement remains a key issue for HRT interaction [34,35,44,53].”
Intelligent Agent Transparency in Human–Agent Teaming for Multi-UxV Management (2016, background): “An appropriate calibration of trust in an IA is especially vital in high-risk situations, such as military operations, where over-and undertrust can be disastrous (de Visser et al., 2012; Freedy, DeVisser, Weltman, & Coeyman, 2007; Groom & Nass, 2007; Lee & See, 2004; Parasuraman & Riley, 1997).”