The measurement of attachment security and related constructs in infancy and early childhood.

By J. Solomon, C. George. 2008

265 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/16758a71199c3c1cfbe6bc81f14368e747d478e4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. J. Stern
2. J. Cassidy
3. Matthew J. Dykas
4. Carla Sharp
5. Meifen Wei

Citations in the corpus

• Mentalizing in the Development and Treatment of Attachment Trauma (2013, unknown): “…婴儿依恋系统的条件。 在各种环境条件中，如果一个年幼的孩子已经成功地依恋某个 特定的对象，那么下面这些外部条件可能会激活依恋行为：依恋对 象的消失、远离、消失后再回归、拒绝、缺少回应，以及各种各样 令人惊恐的事件，包括身处不熟悉的环境和遇到陌生人。还有包括 疾病、饥饿、疼痛、寒冷等在内的各种各样的内部条件。此外，在 以后的几年里，依恋行为似乎很容易被其他不太强烈的条件激活、 维持或强化。（Ainsworth，Blehar，Waters，& Wall，1978，p.7） 18…”
• Attachment and the processing of social information across the life span: theory and evidence. (2011, background): “Moreover, for measures that provide windows into children’s representations of parent-related and/or dyadic child–parent-related knowledge, see Klagsbrun and Bowlby (1976; see also Kaplan, 1987, and Slough & Greenberg, 1990) for the Separation Anxiety Test and Bretherton, Ridgeway, and Cassidy (1990”
• Empathy from infancy to adolescence: An attachment perspective on the development of individual differences (2017, methodology): “With regard to attachment, researchers should rely on gold-standard measures such as the Strange Situation and other observational separation–reunion procedures that have been validated for use with children through age 6 (see Solomon & George, 2016).”