Conceptual spaces - the geometry of thought

726 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The distribution and category status of adjectives and adverbs (2010, background): “Adjectives typically denote concepts which are one-dimensional, in distinction to nouns, and stative, in distinction to verbs (Gardenfors 2000).”
Nonintentional similarity processing (2005, unknown): “space models (e.g., Gardenfors, 2000; see Gentner & Markman, 1995; Markman, 1999;”
Dimensions and their poles: A metric and topological approach to opposites (2011, background): “…slightly, we can distinguish between: (1) closed poles, which are the minimum or the maximum of a scale, such as closed in OPEN CLOSED or both EMPTY and FULL in EMPTY FULL and (2) open poles, which are unbounded, such as tall in SHORT TALL (for related ideas, see Gardenfors, 2000, 2007).”
Adjectives and boundedness (2001, background): “Boundedness has been discussed in the literature in the context of nouns and verbs (Declerck 1979, Dahl 1981, Langacker 1987a, Talmy 1988, Jackendoff 1991, Frawley 1992, Verkuyl 1993, Depraetere 1995, Brinton 1998).”
Navigating cognition: Spatial codes for human thinking (2018, methodology): “Thus, a concept is defined as a set of convex regions in a number of domains, with domains weighted on the basis of salience and additional information about how the regions in different domains are correlated (16).”