Resource partitioning by Lake Tana barbs predicted from fish morphometrics and prey characteristics

By F. Sibbing, L. Nagelkerke. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 2004

208 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Do we protect biological originality in protected areas? A new index and an application to the Bonifacio Strait Natural Reserve (2008, background): “Related to the prey catching mode Orientation of the mouth Method of food acquisition (Dumay et al., 2004; Sibbing and Nagelkerke, 2001).”
Functional groups of lagoon fish species in Languedoc Roussillon, southern France (2004, background): “Hunting fishes need efficient visual acuity; (vi) oral gape position (Pos) is the angle of the oral gap with the body line, giving information about capture mode or benthic character (Sibbing & Nagelkerke, 2001).”
Correlations between lizard cranial shape and diet: A quantitative, phylogenetically informed analysis (2005, methodology): “Using biomechanical principles, and considering the requirements for processing different food types (Lucas & Pereira, 1990; Lucas et al ., 2000; Sibbing & Nagelkerke, 2001), functional hypotheses can be constructed.”
Predicting trophic guild and diet overlap from functional traits: statistics, opportunities and limitations for marine ecology (2011, methodology): “…capacity and efficiency of the capture (Sibbing & Nagelkerke 2001) Gill raker length GRlst Filter feeding ability or gill protection (adapted from Sibbing & Nagelkerke 2001) Eye size Edst Prey detection (adapted from Boyle & Horn 2006) Eye position Eps Vertical position in the water column (Gatz…”