Water resources, institutions, & intrastate conflict

By Theodora-Ismene Gizelis, Amanda Wooden. 2010

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1630540f677505d65866f2d3cea90149d1b152b6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. Tobias Böhmelt
2. T. Bernauer
3. V. Koubi

In Sociology and Political Science

1. T. Bernauer
2. Tobias Böhmelt
3. V. Koubi
4. Gabriele Spilker
5. Anna Kalbhenn

Citations in the corpus

• Demand, supply, and restraint: Determinants of domestic water conflict and cooperation (2014, unknown): “Indeed, Gizelis and Wooden (2010) find that democratic institutions mitigate the impact of water scarcity on intrastate-armed conflict.”
• Do natural resources matter for interstate and intrastate armed conflict? (2014, background): “For example, Hauge & Ellingsen (1998) find that land degradation, freshwater scarcity, and deforestation all have positive and significant effects on the incidence of armed conflict (see also Raleigh & Urdal, 2007; Gizelis & Wooden, 2010).”
• Climate variability, economic growth, and civil conflict (2012, background): “8 Gizelis & Wooden (2010) make a similar argument pertaining to the impact of water scarcity on conflict and find evidence that democracy mediates water scarcity on civil conflict onset.”
• Environmental changes and violent conflict (2012, background): “Gizelis and Wooden (2010) and Koubi et al (2012) argue that economic conditions and political institutions affect the distribution of and access to environmental resources.”