THE CASE AGAINST JIVE
By Russell Davidson, James G. MacKinnon. 2006
67 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/162e7b9ed5462af423b4ca5861adb15cf0118c71
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Christian Hansen
- Whitney K. Newey
- Jerry A. Hausman
- Victor Chernozhukov
- Michael J. Kolesar
- Norman R. Swanson
- Tiemen Woutersen
- John C. Chao
In Finance
- Christian Hansen
- Whitney K. Newey
- Tiemen Woutersen
- G. Bascle
- Jerry A. Hausman
- John C. Chao
- Norman R. Swanson
- James H. Stock
In Statistics and Probability
- Whitney K. Newey
- Christian Hansen
- Victor Chernozhukov
- Norman R. Swanson
- John C. Chao
- G. Bascle
- Jerry A. Hausman
- Tiemen Woutersen
Citations in the corpus
- Estimation with Weak Instruments: Accuracy of Higher-order Bias and MSE Approximations (2004, unknown): “Hausman (1983) for a derivation and analysis.”
- Jackknife estimation of stationary autoregressive models (2013, unknown): “…and demonstrated its superior finite sample properties compared to the two-stage least squares estimator and its comparability to the limited information maximum likelihood estimator, although the performance of this estimator has subsequently been criticised by Davidson and MacKinnon (2006).”
- Estimation With Many Instrumental Variables (2006, result): “These results are also consistent with recent Monte Carlo work of Davidson and MacKinnon (2006).”
- ASYMPTOTIC DISTRIBUTION OF JIVE IN A HETEROSKEDASTIC IV REGRESSION WITH MANY INSTRUMENTS (2011, background): “We show that JIV estimators are asymptotically normal and that standard errors are consistent provided that√ Kn/rn → 0 as n → ∞, where Kn and rn denote, respectively, the number of instruments and the concentration parameter.”
- Improved JIVE Estimators for Overidentified Linear Models with and without Heteroskedasticity (2009, unknown): “X CI J I V E = X (Pz − DPz)(I − DPz)−1 (13) = (Zπ + η) (Pz − DPz)(I − DPz)−1 = π Z (I − DPz)(I − DPz)−1 + η CI J I V E = π Z + η CI J I V E .”
- Controlling for endogeneity with instrumental variables in strategic management research (2008, methodology): “For the OLS estimation, the impact of dividends on excess value is positive and highly significant; for the fixed-effects estimation, the impact is negative and significant at the 10 percent level; and for the FGLS estimation, the impact is almost 0 and not significant.35 The three instrumental vari”
- Instrumental Variable Estimation with Heteroskedasticity and Many Instruments (2012, methodology): “It is also as efficient asymptotically and performs as well in our Monte Carlo results as LIML under homoskedasticity, thus overcoming the Davidson and MacKinnon (2006) objection to JIV.”