A common ingroup identity: A categorization-based approach for reducing intergroup bias.
By S. Gaertner, John F. Dovidio. 2009
102 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/16245f9839abb1b36b05a8ed6e365d887c080deb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- John F. Dovidio
- Miles Hewstone
- S. Gaertner
- Anja Eller
- Adam R. Pearson
- Tamar Saguy
- Elze G. Ufkes
- A. Love
Citations in the corpus
- Improving intergroup relations through direct, extended and other forms of indirect contact (2011, background): “…but also see Eller & Abrams, 2003, 2004), the manner in which contact changed the ways people socially categorized others and perceived the relationship between these categories played a pivotal role in improving intergroup attitudes (Brown & Hewstone, 2005; Gaertner & Dovidio, 2009; Miller, 2002).”
- Pay It Forward: Gratitude in Social Networks (2011, background): “The common in-group identity theory has suggested that one method to reduce an individual’s own-group bias (i.e., the tendency to distinguish ‘‘we’’ from ‘‘them’’) is to direct individuals to focus on their common identity with outsiders (Gaertner and Dovidio 2009).”
- Aversive Racism and Contemporary Bias (2016, background): “It is possible for members to conceive of themselves as holding a “dual identity” in which other identities and a superordinate identity are salient simultaneously (Crisp, Stone, & Hall, 2006; Gaertner & Dovidio, 2009).”
- Reducing intergroup bias through intergroup contact: Twenty years of progress and future directions (2017, background): “Moreover, as with decategorization, more positive feelings toward others formerly perceived as members of an outgroup may generalize more strongly to the outgroup as a whole when both common identity and original group identities, which provide the associative link between outgroup and contact partn”
- Included but Invisible? Subtle Bias, Common Identity, and the Darker Side of “We” (2016, background): “…substituting separate group identities with a common ingroup identity (related to assimilation) or creating dual identities (reflecting multiculturalism), can produce more positive intergroup attitudes (see Gaertner & Dovidio, 2009; Gaertner, Dovidio , Guerra, Hehman, & Saguy, 2016, for a review).”