Modeling wave runup with depth-integrated equations

By Patrick J. Lynett, Tso-Ren Wu, L. Philip, Franklin Liu. 2002

418 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A numerical study of submarine–landslide–generated waves and run–up (2002, methodology): “The moving-boundary scheme employed here is the technique developed by Lynett et al .”
Oceanic propagation of a potential tsunami from the La Palma Island (2008, methodology): “For individually breaking solitary-like waves gradient dependent diffusion have been employed with some success [Kennedy et al., 2000; Lynett et al., 2002; Lynett, 2006] but, to the authors knowledge, no theoretical study on the evolution of breaking undular bores is published.”
Depth‐integrated, non‐hydrostatic model for wave breaking and run‐up (2009, methodology): “which cover a wide range of non-breaking and breaking waves, have become an accepted test case for validation of run-up models [20, 30, 32, 33].”
Dispersion of tsunamis: does it really matter? (2013, methodology): “The standard models, such as COULWAVE (Lynett et al., 2002; Kim and Lynett, 2011) and FUNWAVE (Kennedy et al., 2000; Shi et al., 2012) are based on moredemanding numerical schemes and incorporate a number of effects that are not relevant for oceanic propagation.”
Depth‐integrated, non‐hydrostatic model with grid nesting for tsunami generation, propagation, and run‐up (2010, methodology): “The collected data has become a standard for validation of runup models (Liu et al., 1995a; Titov and Synolakis, 1998; Chen et al., 2000; Lynett et al., 2002; and Wei et al., 2006).”