Roughness losses and volume-current methods in photonic-crystal waveguides

By S. G. Johnson, M. Povinelli, Marin Soljačić, A. Karalis, S. Jacobs, John D. Joannopoulos. 2005

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Surfaces, Coatings and Films

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/161d2881db67a79acd39e36897593ca5f12dfb76

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

1. Shankar Kumar Selvaraja
2. John D. Joannopoulos
3. Steven G. Johnson
4. Wim Bogaerts
5. Peter Bermel
6. Mihai Ibanescu
7. David Roundy
8. Ardavan F. Oskooi

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Shankar Kumar Selvaraja
2. John D. Joannopoulos
3. Wim Bogaerts
4. Steven G. Johnson
5. Peter Bermel
6. Mihai Ibanescu
7. David Roundy
8. Ardavan F. Oskooi

In Surfaces, Coatings and Films

1. Shankar Kumar Selvaraja
2. Steven G. Johnson
3. Wim Bogaerts
4. John D. Joannopoulos
5. Shanhui Fan

Citations in the corpus

• Compact Single-Mode Silicon Hybrid Rib/Strip Waveguide With Adiabatic Bends (2011, background): “However, the large index contrast comes with a significant drawback: Scattering losses are much higher [ 3 ], [4].”
• Meep: A flexible free-software package for electromagnetic simulations by the FDTD method (2010, background): “Third, the fields directly on the interface are still at best first-order accurate even with subpixel smoothing—however, these localized errors are equivalent to currents that radiate zero power to first order [36,44].”