Data Management for Peer-to-Peer Computing : A Vision

By Philip A. Bernstein, Fausto Giunchiglia, Anastasios Kementsietsidis, John Mylopoulos, Luciano Serafini, Ilya Zaihrayeu. International Workshop on the Web and Databases, 2002

468 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Composing Mappings Among Data Sources (2003, background): “To copy otherwise, or to republish, requires a fee and/or special permission from the Endowment. with federated databases [27], followed by data integration systems [30, 14, 18], peer data management systems [12, 10, 2, 16, 17, 25], and data exchange systems [24, 26, 8].”
Model management 2.0: manipulating richer mappings (2007, background): “In any case, the runtime needs to be able to process a query on T by propagating it through the chain [14][53].”
Super-peer-based routing and clustering strategies for RDF-based peer-to-peer networks (2003, background): “[3] propose the Local Relational Model (LRM) enabling general queries to be translated into local queries with respect to the schema supported at the respective peer, using the concept of local translation/coordination formulas to translate between different schemas.”
Ontology Matching (2007, methodology): “Semantic P2P systems (Staab and Stuckenschmidt 2006) use more complex specifications of their contents, such as database schemas (Bernstein et al. 2002), or formal ontologies (Rousset et al.”