Automated Response Using System-Call Delay
By Anil Somayaji, Stephanie Forrest. USENIX Security Symposium, 2000
309 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/15fa2be1a377a505d017c586f0dcf7e966e69b6f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Joseph Gardiner
- Gabriela F. Cretu-Ciocarlie
- Battista Biggio
- Angelos Stavrou
- Michael E. Locasto
- Shishir Nagaraja
- Salvatore J. Stolfo
- Angelos Dennis Keromytis
Citations in the corpus
- Casting out Demons: Sanitizing Training Data for Anomaly Sensors (2008, background): “We are, however, currently investigating two additional sensors: one based on libanomaly and one based on the pH system [22].”
- Adaptive Anomaly Detection via Self-calibration and Dynamic Updating (2009, background): “pH [ 24 ]). Despite the best efforts of the research community, no AD sensor has been proposed to date that can detect all attack types while maintaining a low alert rate.”
- Traffic Morphing: An Efficient Defense Against Statistical Traffic Analysis (2009, methodology): “The morphing algorithm refers to the appropriate morphing matrix for the source process, and pads the data (or splits it into several smaller packets) according to the matrix.”
- Behavior of Machine Learning Algorithms in Adversarial Environments (2010, methodology): “Independently, Wagner and Soto [2002] have also developed mimicry attacks against a sequence-based IDS called pH proposed by Somayaji and Forrest [2000]. Using the machinery of finite automata, they construct a framework for testing whether an IDS is susceptible to mimicry for a particular exploit.”
- Detecting energy-greedy anomalies and mobile malware variants (2008, methodology): “, enumerating sequences [26, 47], ngram vectors [15], data-mining techniques [28], Bayesian classification [35], neural networks [34], finite-state automata [43], and hidden Markov models [54].”
- UNICORN: Runtime Provenance-Based Detector for Advanced Persistent Threats (2020, background): “stems are not well-suited to APTs. Detectors dependent on malware signatures are blind to attacks that exploit new vulnerabilities [20]. Anomaly-based systems typically analyze series of system calls [114] and log-adjacent system events [130], but most of them [36], [81], [92], [109] have difficulty ”
- On the Security of Machine Learning in Malware C&C Detection (2016, methodology): “The attack is tested against the pH IDS [Somayaji and Forrest 2000], by modifying the autowx attack script exploit.”
- Throttling viruses: restricting propagation to defeat malicious mobile code (2002, background): “Other related work by [1] suggests ways to limit machines so that they cannot participate in network attacks, and [14] give an example of benign responses used in an intrusion detection application.”