Mean-field view on rotating magnetoconvection and a geodynamo model

By M. Schrinner, K. Rädler, D. Schmitt, M. Rheinhardt, U. Christensen. 2005

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

PERSISTENT MAGNETIC WREATHS IN A RAPIDLY ROTATING SUN (2010, methodology): “A tensor representation of theα-effect may also do much better at approximatingEFI, and test-field techniques could be employed to measure this quantity (e.g., Schrinner et al. 2005, and recently reviewed in Brandenburg 2009).”
The Maunder minimum (1645–1715) was indeed a grand minimum: A reassessment of multiple datasets (2015, methodology): “The observational knowledge of the turbulent quantities is especially limited, and they have to be estimated using local direct numerical simulations (e.g. Schrinner et al. 2005; Käpylä et al. 2009).”
Astrophysical magnetic fields and nonlinear dynamo theory (2004, methodology): “This 11 type of analysis has been applied successfully to laminar stationary convection in a sphere exhibiting a dynamo effect [336].”
Mean-field concept and direct numerical simulations of rotating magnetoconvection and the geodynamo (2006, unknown): “As a consequence of the symmetry properties of the velocity field and the induction equation, all mean-field coefficients are 1 The same value of E has been used in the magnetoconvection calculations of Schrinner et al. (2005, 2006).”