Recent analysis of key plasma wall interactions issues for ITER

By J. Roth, E. Tsitrone, Alberto Loarte, T. Loarer, G. Counsell, R. Neu, V. Philipps, S. Brezinsek, M. Lehnen, P. Coad and 12 more. 2009

785 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/15eee1a92dad302ae84e9388cd10b12b1a9a16ca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Materials Chemistry

1. A. Kukushkin
2. Alberto Loarte
3. A. Boozer
4. T. Hirai
5. R. Pitts

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

1. A. Kukushkin
2. Alberto Loarte
3. A. Boozer

Citations in the corpus

• ITER plasma-facing components (2010, background): “apour shielding effects at high power fluxes tend to enhance W rosion compared with C [9,10].”
• High heat flux components—Readiness to proceed from near term fusion systems to power plants (2010, neutral): “• Laboratory experiments and modeling are indispensable for the extrapolation of many aspects of PMI (see for example [43]).”
• Tungsten ‘fuzz’ growth re-examined: the dependence on ion fluence in non-erosive and erosive helium plasma (2015, neutral): “According to [34], the net ITER tungsten fuzz erosion rate is predicted to be ∼ × − 3 10 10 ms−1 which is closely similar to the highest fluence case reported here.”
• Principal physics developments evaluated in the ITER design review (2009, background): “While this is still the subject of on-going R&D ([29, 34] and references in both), contributions from the EU Plasma–Wall Interaction task force and US Burning Plasma Organization have led to valuable insight [35, 36].”