Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation

By Jiatao Gu, James Bradbury, Caiming Xiong, Victor O. K. Li, Richard Socher. 2017

925 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Existing approaches to neural machine translation condition each output word on previously generated outputs. We introduce a model that avoids this autoregressive property and produces its outputs in parallel, allowing an order of magnitude lower latency during inference. Through knowledge distillation, the use of input token fertilities as a latent variable, and policy gradient fine-tuning, we achieve this at a cost of as little as 2.0 BLEU points relative to the autoregressive Transformer network used as a teacher. We demonstrate substantial cumulative improvements associated with each of the three aspects of our training strategy, and validate our approach on IWSLT 2016 English-German and two WMT language pairs. By sampling fertilities in parallel at inference time, our non-autoregressive model achieves near-state-of-the-art performance of 29.8 BLEU on WMT 2016 English-Romanian.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Natural Language Processing

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Jianfeng Gao
  2. Mohit Bansal
  3. Graham Neubig
  4. Quoc V. Le
  5. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  6. Yoshua Bengio
  7. Kyunghyun Cho
  8. Percy Liang

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Luc Van Gool
  2. Dacheng Tao
  3. Trevor Darrell
  4. Jitendra Malik
  5. Ming-Hsuan Yang
  6. Xiaogang Wang
  7. Andrew Zisserman
  8. Yi Yang

In Natural Language Processing

  1. Graham Neubig
  2. Kyunghyun Cho
  3. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  4. Mohit Bansal
  5. Yonatan Belinkov
  6. Jianfeng Gao
  7. Noah A. Smith
  8. Felix Stahlberg

Citations in the corpus