Sustainable development: Our Common Future revisited

By E. Holden, K. Linnerud, David Banister. 2014

565 citations recorded by the source corpus.

No clear definition of sustainable development exists to guide politicians in solving challenges at the global or regional levels. Rather, the concept's use has increasingly reflected socially desirable attributes of solutions to local- and project-level problems, but these ignore the global challenges that the concept was meant to address. We return to the original definition of sustainable development used in the Brundtland Report and suggest an assessment method to determine whether countries currently meet the threshold values of four equally important primary dimensions: safeguarding long-term ecological sustainability, satisfying basic needs, and promoting intragenerational and intergenerational equity. We also define indicators and threshold values for each of these dimensions; in addition, we show how 167 countries compare in meeting these threshold values. Currently, no country meets all four thresholds. Even so, we propose that, with the use of technology and behavioural changes, it will be possible to reach the threshold values by 2030.

Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/15e4d6ca4b9c2c92afde9db7cb25aa568af19faf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

  1. F. Wallentin
  2. K. Linnerud
  3. D. Gasper
  4. David Banister
  5. R. B. Swain
  6. E. Holden
  7. D. Clark
  8. Bernd Carsten Stahl

In Transportation

  1. David Banister

Citations in the corpus