Quantum mechanics as quantum information, mostly

By Christopher A. Fuchs. 2003

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/15e3782b14c7a0c15e8bd2af9e212afa35309441

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Christopher A. Fuchs
2. Ruediger Schack
3. Robert W. Spekkens
4. A. J. Scott
5. Lucien Hardy
6. C. Ferrie
7. Carlton M. Caves

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

1. Christopher A. Fuchs
2. Ruediger Schack
3. A. J. Scott
4. Robert W. Spekkens
5. Gregg Jaeger
6. Lucien Hardy
7. Carlton M. Caves
8. C. Ferrie

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

1. Christopher A. Fuchs
2. Ruediger Schack
3. Robert W. Spekkens
4. C. Ferrie

Citations in the corpus

• A Quantum-Bayesian Route to Quantum-State Space (2009, background): “Maybe even more importantly, the success of this approach provides a compelling case for quantum Bayesianism [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12].”
• Quantum-Bayesian Coherence (2009, background): “For instance, the core arguments for why we choose a more “personalist Bayesianism” rather than a so-called “objective Bayesianism” can be found in Fuchs (2002a, 2013) and Fuchs and Schack (2004), and the argument for why a subjective, personalist account of certainty is crucial for breaking the imp”