U.S. Imports, Exports, and Tariff Data, 1989-2001

By Robert C. Feenstra, John Romalis, Peter K. Schott. 2002

490 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/15c8acf3de33345026954a9561e635ec2cc2ed4b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Estimating Cross-Country Differences in Product Quality* (2008, unknown): “Census Bureau and compiled by Feenstra et al. (2002). The database records the customs value of all U.”
Off the Cliff and Back? Credit Conditions and International Trade During the Global Financial Crisis (2012, methodology): “We map SIC 4-digit to NAICS 3-digit industries using concordance weights between the two classification systems constructed from US import volumes from 1989–2006, obtained from the Feenstra et al. (2002) database.”
Product differentiation and duration of US import trade (2006, methodology): “The analysis is based on US import statistics as compiled by Feenstra (1996) and extended by Feenstra et al. (2002).2 We provide a brief description of data and refer the interested reader to Besedeš and Prusa (2006) for a more detailed description, as well as a discussion of all relevant issues…”
Does product market competition foster corporate social responsibility? Evidence from trade liberalization (2015, methodology): “Reduction of import tariff rates To measure increases in foreign product market competition, I use industry-level import tariff data compiled by Feenstra (1996), Feenstra, Romalis, and Schott (2002), and Schott (2010).”
Structural gravity equations with intensive and extensive margins (2010, unknown): “3, and Erkel-Rousse and Mirza (2002) obtain a mean value of 3.”
Trade costs, firms and productivity (2006, methodology): “7 We use the concordance provided by Feenstra et al. (2002) to match products to four-digit SIC industries.”
US exports and employment (2019, unknown): “(21)The manufacturing share is positively correlated with both export expansion and import exposure because of the construction of the Bartik weights used in (14), where Lis,t0 in the numerator is employment in manufacturing sector s and commuting zone i, while Li,t0 in the denominator is the total ”
Immigrant-trade links, transplanted home bias and network effects (2007, methodology): “I alter Gould’s measure to compensate for 9 The three variables in the TRADEijt vector are derived using data from Feenstra et al. (2002).”
A concordance between ten-digit U.S. harmonized system codes and SIC/NAICS product classes and industries (2011, unknown): “Feenstra et al. [5] provide background for U.S. HS10-level trade data for 1989 to 2001.”
Survival of the best fit: exposure to low-wage countries and the (uneven) growth of U.S. manufacturing plants (2003, methodology): “Using data and concordances compiled by Feenstra (1996) and Feenstra et al. (2002), we are able to compute V SH for 385 of 459 four-digit SIC (SIC4) manufacturing industries between 1972 and 1992.”