BMC Bioinformatics BioMed Central Methodology article A simple and fast heuristic for protein structure comparison

2007

Citations in the corpus

• Advances and pitfalls of protein structural alignment. (2009, background): “…(cid:2)(cid:2) ,71] Norm 0 : 25 N e e (cid:4) 0 : 39 rmsd 2 (cid:4) 1 : 7 Topofit’s empirical Z -score TOPOFIT [18 (cid:2)(cid:2) ] rmsd optimization [14], multiple structure alignment [15 (cid:2) ], fragment assembly [6 (cid:2)(cid:2) ,31], and the alignment of interfaces in protein complexes [32].”
• Fast overlapping of protein contact maps by alignment of eigenvectors (2010, methodology): “To our knowledge, up to now, only two heuristic methods, MSVNS [16] and SADP [11], have been proposed for the CMO problem.”
• GR-Align: fast and flexible alignment of protein 3D structures using graphlet degree similarity (2014, background): “CMO is interesting because it is translation/rotation invariant, and its corresponding scoring scheme is in good agreement with the structural classification of proteins (SCOP, Murzin et al. , 1995).”
• Toward an accurate prediction of inter-residue distances in proteins using 2D recursive neural networks (2014, background): “structures similarity [23-25], in the prediction of protein folding rates [26], protein disorder [27] and inter-domain”