Lack of relationship between below‐ground competition and allocation to roots in 10 grassland species

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Competitive interactions between two meadow grasses under nitrogen and phosphorus limitation (2010, background): “However, Güsewell (2005b) observed the opposite for Molinia caerulea (P-limited habitats) and Phalaris arundinacea (N-limited habitats), and in other studies the RMR of grasses from N or P limited habitats were rather similar (Ryser & Lambers 1995), or there was no relationship between RMR and below”
Allocation, plasticity and allometry in plants (2004, result): “5; Müller et al. 2000; Cahill 2003).”
Above‐ and below‐ground competition cues elicit independent responses (2007, background): “Studies of non-leguminous species, however, have yielded different results suggesting between-species variation in response to root neighbours (Cahill 2003; S. A. Dudley & L. A. Donovan, unpublished data; Semchenko et al .”
Differential genetic influences on competitive effect and response in Arabidopsis thaliana (2005, background): “2002), while root system biomass is unrelated to relative competitive ability (Cahill 2003).”